Ancestor Portrait

Home > Uncategorized > Ancestor Portrait

April 19th, 2009 admin Leave a comment Go to comments

Help a matter of Rome?

Why art has a religious significance for the Romans? All the gods of the Roman Roman art depicts worshiped their ancestors, by what he sees as the portraits for the most important relics of Rome, the art was used only to decorate the temples, they believed that the representations people have really become the recipients of their souls, thank you soo much! I'll give 10 POINTS !!!!! XD

No, No, No! Read Coleen McColough, Grass Crown, the first man in the art of Rome, Roman, etc. represents their feelings, just like art Today is not (although modern art is much more individualistic, and therefore so much more logical consequence). Art not only in temples. No religion, but gave respect to their anscestors. They (the rich Romans) prevented the wax anscestors she recalled, but were not recipients of souls! Nonsense! Pliny, Caesar, Cicero, Petronious Tacitus, Cato even claim cons you! The art had a religious significance for the Romans, the pictures of James Dean and Marilyn Monroe have a sense like the idiots addressed soon today! Get rational. To be motivated. Get Science. That's what we've all tried to portray the Roman influence and extend between the Empire. And that's why you ran another troublemaker like Jesus and not fkwitted we believe it is worthy to portray. Concept interesting, but. Give thanks for asking!